Some image makers use a large watermark giving the viewer a taste of the original image and ask the viewer to contact them for un-watermarked versions. Posting only small originals may deter some copying because of the loss of quality when enlarged. But, as others have noted, all these precautions are only deterrents to copying or grabbing.
There is at present no "thing" on Flickr or anywhere else in computing that allows an image to be seen on a computer screen but not copied. If someone ever develops such technology they could become very rich. But, at present, anything appearing on a computer screen can be copied by those who know how to do it and even the metadata embedded within the image data which may give details of ownership can be stripped out by those who know how to do it.
I have learned to see through it - and anyhow, a good photo will survive a watermark. You can have a invisible code by registering you photography work by Digimarc. This company have also a excellent system to trace if a jerk have stolen one of you work and put them on the net on another place. It's much more easy to take legal actions with lawyer against thief when you work is registred. When a photo is from high quality on a photographical point of view with a watermark or without this photo will stay from high quality and those who don't appreciate a watermark on a photography must simply looking to other works, So hope this can help you Posted 96 months ago.
As soon as you did that, you lost complete control over them. No protection once your clicks are posted in web Posted 96 months ago. Flickr logo. If you click it, you'll go home. Sign Up Explore. Upload Sign In. Share it here. Click here to get started and to read our Forum Guidelines. Latest: 17 months ago Current Discussion Slow and Gateway timeouts Latest: 88 seconds ago Recent Activity Latest: 77 minutes ago Why do people sometimes put "on" or "off" or both "on" and "off" in their Flickr display names?
Latest: 10 hours ago [Acknowledged by Flickr Staff] Feed page vs. Upload Sign In. Share it here. Click here to get started and to read our Forum Guidelines. Latest: 17 months ago Current Discussion Slow and Gateway timeouts Latest: 88 seconds ago Recent Activity Latest: 77 minutes ago Why do people sometimes put "on" or "off" or both "on" and "off" in their Flickr display names?
Latest: 10 hours ago [Acknowledged by Flickr Staff] Feed page vs. Latest: 20 hours ago More Search the Help Forum Sign photos after they have been uploaded. Feed — Subscribe to help discussion threads. Latest: 27 hours ago. New Flickr Notifications Center and Settings available to all members. Latest: 2 months ago. Welcome to the Flickr Help Forum!
Latest: 17 months ago. Slow and Gateway timeouts Latest: 88 seconds ago. Recent Activity Latest: 77 minutes ago. Why do people sometimes put "on" or "off" or both "on" and "off" in their Flickr display names? Latest: 2 hours ago. Copyright doesn't stop anyone from using your image.
It just gives you some tools to get payment and stop the use after it has happened. Posted 98 months ago.
Yes i looked in to copyright its expensive. So really in conclusion there isnt really much i can do? I had a lady ask me for a picture off of facebook the other day. It was a photo i used for a cover picture and everyone can see those ones. I politley said no as it was mine then removed the picture. Just wanted to see other than removing pictures what else i could do. Copyright is free. You may need to ask a copyright lawyer in your country, but you may not even need to register your copyright to file a copyright lawsuit.
The laws vary in each country. Also, you may be able to pay a much smaller registration fee if you submit electronic copies of your files and register the copyrights in batches, not individually.
ColleenM : Copyright is free. ColleenM : Also, you may be able to pay a much smaller registration fee if you submit electronic copies of your files and register the copyrights in batches, not individually.
Registration also costs in the uk then you have to pay for the group of photos and its for 5 or 10 years and yes time consuming. It is also cheaper for electronic pictures but at the moment the cost is not within me.
I will maybe look into watermarking to deter people. Thankyou everyone for your advice Posted 98 months ago. What is this please? According to the UK government, there is no copyright registration in the UK, and only private companies charge you to register.
Their charges may include defending your copyright if it is infringed: www. There are certain steps you can take to protect your rights, but you do not have to register anywhere. There are, however, a number of companies that offer unofficial copyright registers. You should think very carefully whether this is a useful service for you before choosing this route. A guest pass is a way to allow people who aren't Flickr members to see your private photos. Be aware that Guest Pass links can be passed to others by those to whom you have issued them.
What is a Guest Pass? One benefit of watermarks, though, is that it does give a visual indication of whose photo it is if they don't crop it out. This is why I used to watermark many of my photos. And cropping the watermark out shows intent to violate copyright, so may net you additional damages if you pursue a case against someone.
IANAL You can add watermarks using just about any image processing software, and there are apps for mobile phones that you can use for that purpose as well. I don't know whether it's available on other platforms though. Many photo-editing applications such as Photoshop offer watermarking features. You may have to dig into the app to find it. Watermarks can also be made right across the image so they cannot be cropped out without effectively destroying the image.
0コメント